Home › Our expertise › Strategy & policy
The world is shaped by decisions
From small choices to strategic direction, every decision counts. But how do you ensure that complex decisions are made consciously and effectively? We help organisations, teams and individuals decide with conscious skill.
Why this matters
The hidden costs of poor decision-making
Decisions are often made intuitively, and in many everyday situations that works fine. But on complex decisions our intuition falls short. Group dynamics, biases and time pressure mean we unconsciously miss big opportunities or take risks we're not aware of.
An example of this is the agreement trap, when discussing all options feels safe, but leads to consensus without sharpness. Another is the advocacy myth, in which people defend their position instead of jointly forming a better decision.
Agreement trap
All options are discussed, but no one chooses explicitly. Consensus is mistaken for a well-grounded decision.
Advocacy myth
People argue for their own preference instead of jointly investigating which decision is best.
Four approaches
How people make decisions
There are four fundamental approaches to decision-making. They're neither good nor bad, but they do suit different contexts. The problem arises when we use the wrong approach for the situation.
Decision Quality
Six links of a good decision
The Decision Quality framework (Spetzler, Winter & Meyer) describes six elements a decision must meet to be of high quality.
Frame
Sharpen what the decision actually is.
Goals
Make clear what you want to achieve.
Alternatives
Generate creative, feasible options.
Information
Gather reliable, relevant facts.
Logic
Reason well about alternatives and consequences.
Commitment
Anchor support for implementation.
An introduction covering the four approaches, the Decision Quality framework and the four roles, to read, share, or use as background reading for workshops. PDF, available in Dutch only.
Collaborative dialogue
Reaching a better decision together
In complex programmes, these four roles determine the quality of the decision. Determine each person's role via a conscious decision-making process (NB. nobody should hold all roles at once).
Decision-owner
Has the formal responsibility to decide.
Subject-matter experts
Supply facts, knowledge and analyses, without making the choice themselves.
Stakeholders
Bring in the perspectives and values of groups affected by the decision.
From the Policy Compass to more conscious policy
In partnership with PwC Netherlands, Rutger contributed to an analysis of the Beleidskompas, the Dutch government's new framework for policy development. The core finding: the compass gives direction, but the quality depends on how consciously policymakers apply it.
In the analysis we identified five recurring barriers in Dutch government policy development:
About the author
Frequently asked questions
FAQ on consciously skilled decision-making
When is intuition useful and when isn't it?
Intuition works well for fast, frequent decisions with limited impact in a familiar context. For more complex decisions intuition falls short, because we don't recognise our biases and can't make the underlying logic explicit. Conscious decision-making means deliberately choosing which approach fits the situation, intuition, rules, relative weighting or value analysis, instead of unconsciously falling back on intuition.
What are the six links of the Decision Quality framework?
The framework by Spetzler, Winter and Meyer describes six elements a decision must meet: a sharp Frame, clear Goals and values, Creative alternatives, Relevant and reliable information, sound Logic, and Commitment to implementation. The strength lies in the weakest link: if one element is missing, the quality of the whole decision drops.
What are the agreement trap and the advocacy myth?
Two common pitfalls in group decision-making. The agreement trap: all options are discussed, but nobody chooses explicitly, consensus is mistaken for a well-grounded decision. The advocacy myth: people defend their own preference instead of jointly investigating what the best decision is. As a result, the idea of the best-connected person often wins, rather than the best solution.
How do you involve stakeholders effectively in complex decisions?
Four roles determine the quality of the decision: the Decision-owner with formal responsibility, Subject-matter experts who provide facts and analyses without choosing themselves, Stakeholders who bring in the perspectives and values of groups affected, and an independent Process facilitator who safeguards quality and progress. A conscious decision-making process makes explicit who plays which role, with nobody holding all roles at once.
When do you use value analysis and when rules?
Rules work well for frequent, standardised decisions with more impact than intuitive choices, such as granting a loan or applying legislation. Value analysis is suitable for complex, strategic or irreversible decisions with many uncertainties, where potential value is weighed against costs and risks. Between the two sits relative weighting, for mid-level choices where multiple criteria need to be weighed together.
Sources & further reading
Get started
Half an hour, and you'll know whether your strategy or policy needs a refresh.
In a no-obligation 30-minute introductory call you’ll get answers to three questions: is Human Centric a good fit for your question, what approach would we suggest, and roughly what would a project cost.
Rutger Legeland
Co-founder of Human Centric
“I run our introductory calls. No sales pitch, just an open conversation about what you need.”
Call or message +31 6 53 84 53 39
Not ready for a call yet? Download consciously skilled decisions (PDF), see our team coaching service or browse the resources.